• En Español
  • 한국어 페이지
  • 中文网
  • বাংলা
Law Offices of Raymond Lo, LLC | New Jersey Immigration Attorneys
Schedule Your Free Consultation

English 800-566-0954 En Español 800-519-2261

English 800-566-0954

En Español 800-519-2261

CoVid Notice: The Law Offices of Raymond Lo, LLC are conducting meetings by telephone / videoconferencing.

Helping You Make Your American Dream Come True

Helping You Make Your American Dream Come True

What does the recent DACA healthcare decision mean for recipients?

On Behalf of | Dec 5, 2024

A recent federal court order has blocked a rule intended to allow Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals recipients to access health coverage under the Affordable Care Act. This ruling directly affects many young immigrants who have long sought affordable, reliable health insurance.

Legal background

Through the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the new rule expanded the definition of “lawfully present” to include DACA recipients. Doing so would have opened the door for them to purchase ACA plans and potentially receive subsidies. However, a group of 19 states, led by Texas, challenged this effort. They argued that redefining “lawfully present” went beyond the agency’s authority and needed congressional action. In December of this year, a United States District Judge sided with the states and issued a ruling temporarily halting the expanded coverage.

Impact on health coverage

Without the option to buy subsidized ACA plans, DACA recipients face fewer affordable health coverage opportunities. Many had hoped to gain ACA coverage starting in January of next year, but now they must look elsewhere (or potentially, remain uninsured). This gap in affordable coverage can mean paying out of pocket for routine checkups or medical emergencies, which places a heavy financial burden on individuals and families already navigating complex immigration challenges.

Worsening existing disparities

DACA recipients have historically struggled to find affordable insurance. This often resulted in recipients remaining uninsured. Without ACA plans, this situation remains unchanged. Lack of coverage can lead to delays in seeking care and poorer long-term health outcomes. This ruling effectively continues a long-standing disparity that leaves many DACA recipients vulnerable to medical and financial hardship.

This decision highlights a core tension: the ongoing legal battles surrounding immigration policies and the power agencies have to interpret federal law. The outcome signals that these debates will continue, and health coverage for DACA recipients will remain uncertain because it is tied to the shifting landscape of court rulings and legislative action. In short, this ruling sets back efforts to provide DACA recipients with more secure, affordable health care. Until legal challenges are resolved (or Congress steps in) many of these young immigrants will remain without a clear path to the insurance coverage they need.